2021-01-25, RRS #1, Machiventa
Rapid Response Solutions #1
Machiventa
Melchizedek, Planetary Manager
Topics:
Rapid Response Solutions and the past tense
Your Stage 2 democracies are naïve
Stage 1 democracies
Stage 2 democracies
Getting to Stage 3
A betrayal of democracy
Lessons to be learned from US acts of sedition
US is in decline as a democracy—Germany and Italy before WWII
Genocide and the Disappeared
Making sense of ethics
Priorities of decision-making
Applying this to January 6 acts of sedition
What needs to be done for the survival of your nation
Possible era of social devolution
Ever lived through a revolution?
Right now, you are a bad example of democracy
It’s not about the dinner table. Division is not the way of
Spirit
Think in terms of progress
Someone near and dear has been radicalized
Helping someone paralyzed by grief
Ivermectin
Intolerance
Separation and defensiveness
Teaching and learning the 7 core values
Democracy is….
Feeling overwhelmed by the magnitude of our tasks
An enticement: Make what we have taught you available to others
Thinking outside the box
TR:
Daniel Raphael, PhD
Invocation:
Sherille
2021-01(Jan)-25
Rapid Response Solutions and the past tense
Machiventa: Good morning, this is
Machiventa Melchizedek. It’s a pleasure to be here with you. As the saying goes
we are “back in the saddle again,” and we are riding on. As we begin this new
era of transcripts, which we will call Rapid Response Solutions, we
thank you for your presence. We are going to begin this new series of sessions
far differently than the one before. We will consider anything that has
occurred since the first of the year as past tense. We are not interested in
the Republicans, Democrats, Independents, or anyone else. We are concerned
about everyone. As planetary managers our perspective is the whole planet. We
want to see all nations progress whether they are democratic or otherwise.
Those individuals who live in non-democratic nations will have perhaps more
difficulties settling their lives in the future as they must undergo a history
of non-God-like ideology.
Your stage 2 democracies are naïve
The
reason why we have named this with a very commercial name, as you might think
(Rapid Response Solutions), is due to the fact that your world is in eminent
danger. Particularly democratic nations. They are naïve at best. As you read
the paper entitled The Progressive’s Handbook for Reframing Democratic
Values, and now the latest issue of a shorter paper called Stage 3
Democracies, you will find that Stage 2 democracies (which is typical of
the United States, Canada, Australia, UK, Nordic countries, Germany, France,
Italy, and so on) are naïve. They are naïve because they trust upon the
goodness of individuals as capable of supporting the existing democratic
society and its social institutions. However, you have recently seen that this
is not the case and that, in fact, the individuals of a democratic nation who
enjoy the freedom to protest—to gather together and share their views—can also
take a violent turn. For those of you who may have in the back of their mind
that the election was stolen and taken away from them, this is not a concern of
ours for today is day one of the new way we want to improve your knowledge
about your own country.
We
will be talking principally about your social institutions of which the
democratic process is one. I will be moving from topic to topic in a rather
loose manner, but eventually, hopefully, today we will stitch those together so
it all makes sense to you.
Stage 1 democracies
I
wish to discuss Stage 1 democracies. Stage 1 democracy is an ideology, a
thought, a sense of urgency in individuals who live under a dictatorship or
repressive monarchy or some other situation where there is a despot or tyrant
in leadership who is usurping the rights of individuals and groups of
individuals. It is a thought of democracy in these countries that will
develop into a Stage 2 democracy. So, Stage 1 is the era of thinking,
philosophy, and ideological development that precedes riot, revolt, rebellion,
and revolution. Stage 2 comes into existence after the revolution and the
initiation of a constitution that contains all of the basic elements of a form
of government, democracy, that including personal rights, social rights,
political rights, and so on.
Stage 2 democracies
You,
meaning the Americans, are in a mature Stage 2 democracy. As you know from
other institutions that have come and gone, social institutions must evolve.
They must develop, progress, and evolve. So, first of all, after a Stage 2
democracy is established, you have the getting-acquainted era where the
citizens exercise their rights in a congress, parliament, or so on and that
through the decades this democracy develops and progresses—meaning that it is
approaching evolutionary change constructively. However, that is the stage
where mature type 2 democracies now exist. They are mature, they are developed,
and they are becoming ossified meaning that they are becoming bone-like and
brittle so that they are staying in their old ways of behaving. As you know,
mature stage 2 democracies have an oligarchy in place that benefits from their
power and their positions of authority to control the nation and its course,
its economies, and even its social existence. This becomes untenable after a
while when people want more responsibility to exercise their self-determination
which in this case would be liberty—not freedom but liberty— to exercise their
choices of self-determination that do not infringe upon or damage those of
other people.
Getting to Stage 3
This
sets the necessary stage for the evolution of mature stage 2 democracies to a
stage 3. [The differences between] stage 2 and stage 3 democracies are shown on
page 9 of the Stage 3 Democracies manuscript. This manuscript was
co-creatively brought into existence by This One and Avalah Melchizedek. Avalah
was the instigator of most if not all of the papers that he and This One have
written over the last 12 years. These are evolutionary in themselves. That is
why the manuscript number changes occasionally as there are different editions
coming along with changes that need to be included as revisions.
A betrayal of democracy
Your
nation, the one [that] recently has suffered from acts of sedition is on the
brink of moving to the extreme right. This is also occurring in Germany, and
there are embedded individuals within the military and police forces throughout
the democratic nations who have a cloaked visibility to their nations. The
extreme right is a betrayal of democracy. Democracy is the most advanced and
most capable political system that has the capability to evolve. As you know
from history, staid and archaic social institutions suffer revolt, abandonment,
revolution, the swift change through a coup d’état, or some other change to
bring about a more right-leaning or conservative form of government.
Lessons to be learned from US acts of sedition
You
may be asking (or at least you should be asking), “Were there any lessons to be
gained from these acts of sedition?” The situation that occurred—what is the
major lesson of that? From a planetary managers’ perspective and the Most
Highs’ perspective, there is a gross failure of the social institutions of the
democratic process—particularly the democratic government and of education to
maintain the appreciation for democracy by individuals. You note within your
own lifetimes that you or your children or grandchildren now are educated in a
system of education that does not support enculturation of the dominant
culture—meaning that the necessary culture of democratic societies is not being
taught. Patriotism is not taught. The appreciation for freedom is not taught.
And what is missing in this equation, just as [what is] missing from
childrearing and parenting, is holding the children responsible for their
actions and their behaviors. Children will act as they will, and so will
democratic immature or archaic forms of democracy also revolt and go into acts
of sedition and even revolution when they are not taught how to behave and then
not held accountable for what they have learned. These are the simple principles
of education—that you are tested, that you are challenged in what you have
learned. If we teach mathematics and do not ever assess the progress of
students and then move on from the addition, subtraction, multiplication, and
division into quadratic equations and on to trigonometry and calculus without
ever testing the children as to what they have learned from what they have been
taught in the past, there will be no progress. There will be failure along the
way, and this is what you are seeing in the acts of sedition. This is a gross
failure of a democratic nation.
US is in decline as a democracy—Germany and Italy before WWII
We
have taught you before in the materials of social sustainability that it is
necessary to teach, train, test, learn, grow, mature, and evolve. You have seen
a very large percentage of your nation, America, between 30 and 40% of citizens
both highly educated and those who are not educated who have sided with the
right—meaning the highly conservative position. With this continuing on, your
nations will continue their decline (and yes, you are declining politically,
morally, ethically, and culturally) which will eventually lead to
disintegration due to major factions pulling away from the traditional factions
that support democracy and the rights of individuals. The subtleness of the
move to the right was seen in Germany through the rise of the Nazi regime. It
was also seen subtlety in Italy with the rise of fascism. These are regimes the
beginnings of which have blinkered or put scarfs around the eyes of citizens,
beguiling then bludgeoning them with their increased authority and rights.
Genocide and the Disappeared
On
the other hand, as you’ve seen from those histories of fascist and Nazi
countries, the right eventually will end up creating a genocide or a removal
program of the lives of many individuals so that you will end up with a
population of [the] “disappeared”—people who have disappeared without a trace,
those whose bodies could be found in mass graves in the jungles or wherever.
This is not impossible to occur in the United States, Germany, France, the
United Kingdom, or other democratic nations that are mature type 2 democracies.
Making sense of ethics
You
are asking: “Machiventa; what are the alternatives?” Well, first of all we need
to write a new rulebook for morality. This One and Avalah have written the book
Making sense of Ethics and the larger book entitled Organic Morality.
What is missing from both of those books, though the smaller one has been
revised, is the topic of societal morality. This is the missing part from the
educational stream for each new generation. You have been taught traditional
ethics and morality: Don’t kill other people, don’t hurt them, and be fair in
your business and personal relationships. However, democracies depend upon the
survival of society, of your communities. Societies offer families an
opportunity to live in peace and to grow and mature and to raise children
accordingly.
Priorities of decision-making
MM:
As you
look at this illustration, you will see that it has four levels. The first is
where the arrows point to the species. Without the species, everything
dies—individuals, families, communities, societies, civilization, the
individual/family, then below that are organizations and so on. So, if the
species dies, so does everybody else. Simply put, societal morality is taught
to individuals to make decisions that support the species, OK? What is not
said is that by sustaining the species you sustain the genetic program of the
species which each individual has within them. So, when individuals and
families support the species, you are supporting the genetic health of each new
generation of individuals.
The
next level, community, society, and civilization, as you can see in the
illustration has no connecting arrows to or from it. The reason being
that the community, society, and civilization do not make decisions. Yet,
the community, society, and civilization are fully affected by the decisions of
individuals and organizations. Our community, society, and civilization
are the general social environment of our existence.
The
fourth level of social-societal organizations, political-governmental
organizations, and economic-financial organizations provide an operational
structure to communities, societies, and to civilization. Organizations
are important “support pillars” in the decision-making processes of socially
sustainable societies. (What is missing for their decision-making is a
societal morality to guide their decisions and decision-making processes.)
As
a brief review, the individual family supports the species by having
children. The individual/family decides how many children they will
have—none, one, two, or three. In family that has chosen to become a societally
moral family, it would be societally immoral to have more than three
children. The reason being that each child that exceeds the number to
replace the parents when they die become consumers of the resources that would
be used for other individuals. i.e., they would be diminishing the quality
of life of others.
What
you see in the third level down is the community, society, and civilization.
The reason why the arrows run through them is that a community, society, and
civilization does not make decisions, and does not have a location. They don’t
have a mailing address, neither a GPS location. Why they are included in this
illustration is that community, society, and civilization provide the milieu,
the social environment that gives support to the individual and family. How
your society goes, so goes the individual and family. [It’s the] same for
community and civilization. And the reciprocal of that is as the family and the
individual go, so goes society, and you are seeing this now in the developed,
mature Stage 2 Democracies. The moral decline your are seeing now had its
origins in the United States, for example, over 150 years ago. This is a
product of industrialization and so on. The fact is that no one has done
anything about it, and no one has really thought about the societal morality responsibilities
of individuals, the family, and of organizations.
As
you examine the illustration, you will come to the realization that there are
only two bodies of decision makers here. The species does not overtly make
decisions, neither does a community, society, or civilization. The ones who
make decisions include the individual/family and organizations. As we have
spoken and taught you in regard to social sustainability in many earlier
sessions, decision making is the critical point of change that occurs in a
society, community, and civilization. Decisions are the expression of the
values of the culture within organizations, within society and civilization.
The culture contains values. Every culture has a core set of values that
identify that culture and the individuals within that culture. Individuals
support that culture by using the values of that culture to make decisions.
Thus, all the decisions made within a culture will support those cultural
points of view. It’s a circular, self-reinforcing system.
In
order to change a culture that is in decline [toward] eventual
self-destruction, we must introduce new values. We have shared the seven values
that are innate to humans numerous times—perhaps too repetitiously. However,
these are the values that will sustain the individual, organizations,
communities, societies, and civilization when they use them in their
decision-making. The rules for making those decisions are the ethic, morality,
and societal morality that evolve from those seven values.
Applying this to January 6 acts of sedition
Now,
let’s drop back again to January 6 and the acts of sedition. You will see
within that context there is a culture of conservatism that wants to have its
values dominate. Perhaps dominate to the exclusion of everybody else. That is
the type of values that fascism and Nazism promote.
What needs to be done for the survival of your nation
Let’s
take a break here. Let’s change the topic to the format of this session and
future sessions. Why are we, the planetary managers of this planet, the council
of 24, the Most Highs, and everyone else agreeing that it is now time to make
citizens of the world (particularly democratic citizens of the world) aware of
their responsibilities and to teach them what needs to be done in order for
your nation to save itself and survive? OK?
We
have said before—long before, years ago in the Teaching Mission, and when we
began the series on social sustainability—that social sustainability (the
values, ethics, and morality) is being taught in order to develop the social
evolution of your societies to a higher level of social maturity as preparation
for the Days of Light and Life. Some of you have thought this is rather obtuse.
We don’t. It is our responsibility to teach people spirituality. How do
we do that? It is much like what happens when you become a member of
a service organization. New members are inducted into the
organization, consciously taught the organizations values, social mores, and
social standards of behavior and welcomed as a regular member of the group and
culture.
This
process of arriving to a new culture occurs with each newborn child, but in
most cultures and societies there is no induction process and surely no
conscious and intentional enculturation to the culture. That is common
practice in mature Stage 2 Democracies, unfortunately.
Possible era of social devolution
We
are in a very similar situation here with your world. That if your world does
not learn to become more socially mature, it will enter into an era of social
devolution—meaning that the progress you have made in your societies will move
backwards. You will no longer tolerate interracial groups. Diversity will
become an antiquarian movement. Those who hold views of diversity will be
punished severely if not outcast from your society or made into one of the
disappeared. I am putting this in very stark terms for you because I am like
your Dutch uncle. I need to talk to you really off the shoulder so that you
forthrightly get it. Because if you don’t get it, your democracy
is going to be taken away from you–not by us, but by those who want to have
power, control, and authority. If the meek are too meek to stand up for their
personal political rights, then they will be taken away from them and the meek
will disappear. They will become victims.
Ever lived through a revolution?
Yes,
this sounds rather harsh, doesn’t it? But you were perhaps not a member of
those who were going to be taken prisoners in the capitol with zip ties and
taken outside and perhaps killed by some of the more aggressive members of the
actors of sedition. If you’ve never been through a political revolution, if
you’ve never been through an economic revolution you don’t know what I’m
talking about, do you? No, you don’t. You see the news and you see what’s going
on in Syria and those countries in Africa and elsewhere that have suffered
tremendously from revolutions and from the right taking control and command of
your nation. We personally do not want that to happen to democratic nations or
to any nation in the world.
Right now, you are a bad example of democracy
We
are approaching democratic nations first because you are the nations of
example. Right now, you are bad examples of a democracy. You have not taken on
the responsibility of preparing your future generations to take over control of
your government in beneficial and benevolent ways. Let me make this more
personal. You have children, you have grandchildren. What membership in their
future democratic nation will they have? Will they be required to become Nazi’s
or fascists? Will they be required to kneel to those in authority? And those
who don’t will be dispatched as a disappeared. We certainly hope not. That is
not how a planet enters the Days of Light and Life.
Let
us take a break for a few minutes. You will have time to talk among yourselves
in preparation for a question-and-answer session.
BREAK
JT: I never thought I’d
have to be facing this in the United States. We are so divided. There
are two world views, and they are not compatible.
Craig: You can see how they
are silencing everyone who disagrees with them now. They’ve cut them off social
media and taken their channels off YouTube and pulled videos.
Raymon: Statements of taking
children and reprograming them if they don’t agree with your view.
Craig: Yeah. The question is
maybe, how do we start this education and get everyone moving into the page of
the 7 core values?
Raymon: Well, our history says
we have to be brought to the brink.
Craig: It’s certainly
happening now.
Raymon: Mankind never has
willingly made the right choice. We are always brought to the edge of an abyss
before we do it.
Craig: And that’s probably
part of the lack of education that if we’re all educated in the core values,
maybe we wouldn’t need to be brought to the brink to start making…
Daniel: JT, I’m back. I guess
you can unmute everybody.
JT: No one is muted right
now.
It’s not about the dinner table. Division is not the way of
Spirit
I’m
sensing a division within our own ranks.
Daniel: Hmmm.
JT: We are, I don’t know,
maybe equally divided between people who think that the acts of sedition were
acts of sedition or they were perfectly reasonable things to do in light of
what’s happened. There are two world views. There are people who think that
Democrats run child pornography rings and cannibalize little children and…
Daniel: Hold it. Machiventa
has something to say.
MM: This is Machiventa.
Dear children. You are squabbling about what happened at the dinner table and
it’s not about the dinner table, it’s about the world. We said we are not
interested in the sedition (what happened there). It is evidence of something
far, far larger that is occurring in all democratic nations. Whether you think
the sedition should occur or not occur is not relevant to us. It is not a topic
of discussion for this forum. What we are interested in is the social
improvement of your nations. The social, political, and economic improvement of
your nations. Please think in those terms. Divisions are not the way of spirit.
Divisions are not the way of Christ Michael and they were not the way of Jesus
when he was here. Separation causes trauma—causes social competition, political
competition, economic competition, and so on. These are all behaviors which are
destructive to a society. These are developments that deteriorate the
organization of society.
When
you see social destruction and social separation as occurred on January 6th, you are seeing the
eventual demise of a society. Whether you think that’s a good thing or not, it
is that societies then become unorganized and enter into an era of decline. If
you want to educate yourself about where your world is right now, we have had
This One read the three books of Jared Diamond: His last book is called Upheaval:
Turning Points for Nations in Crisis. His second book is Collapse: How
Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. The first book is Guns, Germs, and
Steel: The Fates of Human Societies so that you have a perspective. The
last book, Upheaval, will tell you a great deal about what your nation
is going through right now and will go through for many years as will many
other nations go through it simultaneously. Upheaval is one of those
sudden changes of culture that is nationwide. In this case it is worldwide. His
book called Collapse describes how societies choose to survive or fail.
As Avalah and This One have written in the last few years, history has proven
that all, all nations, empires, societies, cultures, civilizations have
failed and have not survived over time. Yes, there are remnants of them that
still live on. [There are] even members of those ancient cultures and societies
[that] are present today, whether it’s in Peru or it is in Italy, in Rome. What
you will see through these books is what is happening to your world now. This
is viewing the great arc of history of the human species and its civilizations
and its organizations. The reasons why the nations, empires, dynasties, and
governments have all failed is because they did not include decision making
with the values of the species to underlie their decisions. Whether that is the
first four values (the primary values), or the three secondary values. The
three secondary values are necessary for a society or a nation to survive.
Think in terms of progress
So,
when we discuss this now, let us not think about these events that have been a
part of your immediate history. Think in terms of the progress that needs to be
made. Think in terms of creating solutions rather than fixing problems. And
these points are also in the small book Stage 3 Democracies. It is
necessary to use you in this small group to assist us with what you have
in your minds, and what you are thinking about. Yes, we have assessed your
minds during this brief timeout when This One took a break, and we see there is
division. Think in terms of unity—not of us against them type of unity where
you need to have a group of people called “us” against another organized group
of people called “them,” because in all regards, you are them as well.
Now,
I would like to open this back up to questions and answers and let us do this
on an individual basis.
Someone near and dear has been radicalized
Liz: Good morning
Machiventa. I can’t tell you how pleased I am to be with you again. I’ve missed
you. I have someone who is very dear to me who has been radicalized with
conspiracy theories and hate speech and so forth. And I’m very familiar with
what you have been talking about today because I’ve had the privilege of
reading Daniel and Avalah’s work (the ones that you suggested) so I understand
completely what you are talking about, but to me it’s very personal and I don’t
know how to talk to this person who I love so much. I don’t know how to help
him. Will he come around on his own or is there something that I can do or say
to help. I understand talking to children and the grandchildren, but this
person is an adult, and I don’t know how to interact with him. Can you help me?
MM: Help you, sparingly.
Of course, the first step is to love this person. Right?
Liz: Yes, I love him
dearly.
MM: OK. And the second one
is to forgive them. It is very much as Jesus’ last words were on the cross:
“Forgive them for they know not what they are doing.” And the third part is to
be non-confrontive, non-controversial, but yet be honest and humble in your own
perspective and your own positions. Your nation is now undergoing this very
clearly. There needs to be more love and acceptance of people rather
than their political positions. This is one of the most important things to
express to that individual you have in mind: that you love them as they are—as
the individual whom you have known for so long, and that just because they hold
these far different views than yourself, doesn’t mean that you dislike them or
reject them. For that would only entrench them more and more deeply in their
new perspective. Is this clear to you so far?
Liz: Yes. Very much so, and
that has been the position I’ve taken so far. My question is more about moving
forward, but I see that you are in agreement as to that. Would it be of benefit
if I sent him one of Jared Diamond’s books?
MM: Would the person be
open to receive it?
Liz: I don’t know. I would
hope so, but I don’t know.
MM: Then you must discover
that, and perhaps send them a book of your choice.
Helping someone paralyzed by grief
Liz: Alright. Thank you for
that answer. I have another question for you that is a little bit off the topic
of today and yet it is in front of me these days. I have a cousin who I believe
is fairly active in her faith tradition and yet is all but paralyzed with grief
over some deaths that have occurred over the past few years. I’ve come across a
book written in the 1800’s called My Dream of Heaven. Are you familiar
with this?
MM: Somewhat.
Liz: It describes much of
what I believe life on the first or second Mansion world might be like. When
most of the faith traditions talk about heaven, it’s so ambiguous that I’m not
sure that it’s all that meaningful. Those of us who read the Urantia Book have
a better idea about the afterlife, but I thought maybe this is a more accurate
portrayal of the first or second mansion world, and if it is, perhaps I should
send her a copy of this book. Would you speak to that?
MM: Most certainly. What
you want to do is to have a simple book to read (one that is not as
intimidating as 2200 pages long) so that the individual could read the book and
be interested in what is says. Alternatives to heaven are many, as you know,
from the various religions around the world. It is important that this be
presented to that person in the view that this is one view of heaven and that
it is where your loved ones have gone. Thank you.
Liz: Thank you very much. I
appreciate that. That’s all for me today. It’s a beautiful day, and I’m
delighted to be with you.
MM: Ah, thank you. You are
loved as much as you love us and more.
Jeff: Like Liz, I have
missed this community very much during Daniel’s recess, and I hope, Daniel,
that you are refreshed and reinvigorated and enthusiastic going forward. I
certainly am.
Daniel: Most certainly, I am.
Thank you.
Ivermectin
Jeff: Machiventa, it seems
to me that, at least I am, facing a very divisive sort of a situation. As you
know I live in a community of elderly people and you see them driving around in
their own cars with masks on and everybody is very, very concerned about this
COVID virus. It seems to me that almost this virus is being used as: either you
have been vaccinated, or you haven’t; either you are a danger to society, or
you are conforming, and people are using this for political, economic, and
personal advantage. My question directly is this: There is some evidence that a
drug called ivermectin is reasonable effective against this virus and on the
Indian subcontinent, my understanding is that the government is making sure
that people can take this drug because it’s been in use for 40 years and it
seems to be very safe, and they are making it available to people at very, very
reasonable prices and in massive quantities. Are you familiar with this, and is
this a reasonable approach, or do we all need to wait for novel vaccines that
change our DNA through an RNA process [that] I don’t understand?
MM: Facetiously, would you
like to include more questions with your one question?
Jeff: I’m sorry sir. That’s
my bad habit. So, let me ask you just plainly. Is this drug, ivermectin,
effective?
MM: You must ascertain
first what is it effective concerning. Ivermectin is very useful for treating
people who have been infected with COVID and who are recovering. It has a very
high rate of being efficacious concerning that. As far as it being a
preventative, it is not. So, it is useful (there will be higher rates of
survival) by using ivermectin along with other treatments for those who have
contracted or have recently contracted the virus. Thank you.
Jeff: Thank you. I apologize
for rambling.
MM: No worries.
Intolerance
Craig: Good morning
Machiventa. I was just thinking that, not only on January 6th, but over the past
year and maybe much longer, people have become very intolerant of any views
except their own, and they would rather fight people than compromise, or try to
understand other views or accommodate other views. Does that sound like a sort
of take on it that one might have?
Separation and defensiveness
MM: Yes. And let me go
further. One of the tremendous problems that you are seeing with these acts of
separation is that there have been presented no means of integration. Meaning,
how do we see the commonalities? In other words, your referring to my opening comments
about the failure of your democracy, government, and educational system, is
that these groups, organizations, social institutions have not provided
solutions or solution-making procedures for individuals to use in their own
local communities. What you are seeing is that people’s lives are threatened.
People feel vulnerable and threatened by outside differences and changes, and
they are doing what a badger does: they back into their hole and if you try to
approach them, they will race out and attack you viciously. Humans are no
different from this. There are many solutions as I said. There is a desperate
need in your society for creating solutions rather than fixing problems, and
there are truly no immediate means of fixing the problem of social rejection or
social isolation—the attack mode from those people who have withdrawn, who want
to withdraw. And so, when there are differences that come to their door or to
their person, whether it’s in a grocery store, on the highway, or at [their]
front door, they will attack them viciously—verbally and socially—and cause
further separation. Those acts and those words are meant [to make] the person
who came towards them withdraw, and when they don’t withdraw, then you will
have physical altercations and confrontations.
Now
if you expand that to include hundreds of millions of people in a democratic
nation where people have freedom of movement and a lot of self-assigned levels
of self-entitlement, then you will have violence in the streets, violence at
your front door, and violence on the highway. What you are alluding to is one
of the most desperate situations now in most democratic nations that are not
moving forward in evolutionary cadence with social change that has always been
endemic to all populations and particularly so to democratic nations.
I
hope I have opened up several topics for further discussion today or in the
future. Thank you.
Teaching and learning the 7 core values
Craig: All right. I guess it
all comes down to education in the first place and learning the core values,
learning of their existence, and promulgating them and the ethic and morality
that stem from them.
MM: Yes. You are 100%
correct. One of the reasons why we have moved into this political
topic—government and social institution area of politics—is because of the
immediate need. We have not abandoned our discussion of family learning centers
at all. We are highly concerned about that and you in your statements see that
as the long-term solution. That is something that you and we can create
together. It approaches—not attacks, but melts the long arc of violence in a
society. The problem now is to see how we can get your democratic nations
through this firestorm which has just begun. Thank you.
Craig: Alright. Thank you very
much.
Jeff: Machiventa, this is
Jeff. As a follow-up to your immediately preceding remarks, do you have an
opinion or a suggestion of any materials that Liz or I could put up on the 7corevalues.org
website that would be appropriate at this time?
MM: One of the things that
we know is that website visitations last only seconds, and that for individuals
to dig deeper and stay longer is for them to be presented with some what you
call sound bites or aphorisms of wisdom that may lead the individual to read
more deeply. You would want 3 levels of material. One is a very brief statement
that grabs the attention of the visitor and leads them to the second, a little
more detailed explanation of that sound bite or aphorism, and then the third
level maybe something in-between, something a little longer, and then the
fourth level would be the full document. You want to develop the curiosity of
the individual. One of the lead-ins you would want to use is the lead-in of
solution creation. You would want to share with the reader, the visitor, that
as situations become more desperate, more violent, more destructive, and lead
to social disintegration that there are solutions at hand that can be used to
improve the long-term results or long-term prospects of a nation in distress.
Those are contained in all of the manuscripts that we hope you have from Avalah
and This One. The more recent ones are much briefer and more succinct, but they
leave out tremendous detail that will be necessary to reintegrate your
democratic societies. You’re welcome to respond to that if you wish.
Jeff: I have joined sometime
ago the National Civic League which is a non-profit that aids cities and small
governments around the nation. Is that an appropriate place to start planting
some seeds for visiting the 7corevalues.org website. Is it appropriate at
this time?
Democracy is….
MM: Yes. You would want to
visit them and be a guest speaker or stand up and say something when you are
introduced to the group. People will be looking for answers. Right now, many
people will be looking for fights rather than for solutions. They are not
looking for answers. More peaceful people are looking for answers, and
they want constructive ways of approaching the future. Your site must be more
than just the 7 values. It must lead to the morality and ethics, the rules of
decision making, and it should speak to human motivation, and to democracy. Democracy
is the means by which human motivation can safely and constructively express
itself by developing the potential in the individual. That is a very brief,
pithy description and definition of democracy, but it is a truism that will
always exist. Thank you.
Jeff: Is that an appropriate
quote of yours for us to use?
MM: Yes.
Jeff: Thank You.
Feeling overwhelmed by the magnitude of our tasks
Marthe: Machiventa, thank you
very much for this privilege to be here from South Africa. It is evening here.
I have one question that has 3 different parts. When I look at the values and
how it affects the family, community, and nation, right now I’m in a situation
where my partner has been ill for 8-9 days, and he does not want to see a
doctor or want me to push him towards any course of action that he does not
agree with. I realize his life is at stake, so I want to know what the right
way is to proceed. The second one is: as I took my son for a walk, I came
across our resident homeless couple who is HIV positive and [the woman] doesn’t
have the card for the local hospital but has to go to another town. And her
life is at risk. The last thing is I’m in a position where I’m very linked to
many, many people who are decision makers in the country and who can make
decisions, but I realize that I can’t even deal with the closest issues in my
life. How can I hope to have an effect on others, many of whom do not agree
with some of the values that I espouse and I’m trying to share? Thank you very
much.
MM: Concerning your first
question, as I’ve said before, love your neighbor, love your partner as they
are. As he is your partner and he lives with you and you live with him and that
you are in close proximity, it is better to make them comfortable rather than
confront him and to cart him off to the hospital against his will. He would
simply walk out the front door [of the hospital] and be on his way home. The
second is: how you approach the individuals that you find along the wayside is
that you could take the hazard to give them a ride to a hospital, or you would
offer them masks to wear if they didn’t have any. And in your third situation
you would… this is where your new organization of Thought Adjusters comes into
play. You would call upon the planetary Thought Adjuster by way of your own Thought
Adjuster to be of assistance to these people to help them see the truth in what
you have been providing. Further, for those individuals who agree with you and
even disagree with you, they may want to have copies of these documents
surreptitiously rather than having them on a table in front of everyone else to
see and take home. They would be embarrassed, perhaps, to the extent that they
would not take one home. You can only lead people so far to the water, so to
speak, and sometimes it is necessary to bring the water to them or give them
access to it in their own privacy. Do you understand?
Marthe: Absolutely. Thank you
very much. That was incredibly useful.
MM: You are most welcome.
Thank you for being on the call.
JT: That’s all we have in
the question queue. Machiventa, do you have a closing?
An enticement: Make what we have taught you available to others
MM: Yes, thank you. This
is Machiventa. And it’s more than a benediction. It is an enticement, an
enticement to become creators besides planetary managers. You have been
educated by us. You have been informed by us. We have striven to enculturate
you in the way of spirit—the way of right living, right thinking, and right
choices. We have given you a workable ethic and morality for yourself
individually, for your family, for your children, and for your societies. We
have provided all these things to you. Now, they must be made available to
people who come to you who are in need, who are distraught by the actions
around them concerning the virus and also concerning the politics. It is
important that they have options for their enlightenment, for their education,
and for their insights into new ways of thinking. As you are seeing, the old
traditional ways of thinking are at the brink of absolute failure, and that
following them further and making decisions by them will lead to more chaos and
difficulty. It is time to take on more conscious thinking and decision making
and conscious living with yourself, your family, and others. These situations
require the capacity to think outside the box, but what is missing outside the
box is a new box of thinking that is advanced, evolutionary, and leads to peace
and so on.
Thinking outside the box
We
have hopefully provided you with some of these ways of thinking—that the old
traditional ways are no longer working, and that Jesus provided the ultimate
out-of-the-box ideology for life and living as individuals, families,
communities, and societies—that peace and love are the way of social evolution
and lead the way to the Days of Light and Life. You must first become civilized
before you can enter those gates of the city of Light. You must examine
yourselves and your societies as being primitive and that you must create new
realities for yourself and particularly for future generations. If present
generations are passing along hate, bias, and bigotry to their children, then
that is what they will live with as well. It is now time to teach our children
(as we teach you) how to live in peace and love. Good day.
JT: Thank you Machiventa
and thank you Daniel.
[JT:
As this session may be seen as controversial or too important to entrust to a
single transcriptionist, I am including a link to the original audio recording:
https://fccdl.in/NIq5HvQmKj?st=480 Note: Some sections
were reworked for the transcript by Daniel in conjunction with MM and Avalah.]
###